Fall 2011 International Artist-in-Residence Program

There Is Not Anything Which Returns to Nothing

  • Fall 2011 International Artist-in-Residence Program
  • Exhibition Dates: Nov 17,2011 - Jan 08,2012
  • About the artist
  • Jeff Williams at work, cropJeff Williams

    Jeff Williams’s site-specific sculptural works involve intervening in a structure’s architecture to reveal the layers of a building’s history of habitation. His practice incorporates a variety of approaches, including sealing voids, compressing spaces, and opening andRead more

About the exhibition

Jeff Williams presents several proposals for a new kind of architecture in There is Not Anything Which Returns to Nothing. These plans, composed of a video, three photographs, and two sculptures, break down the formal complexities of built structures into their simplest arrangements and most basic materials. His experimental juxtapositions of form and matter rearrange these elements to test their structural and aesthetic limits.

Facing the gallery’s entrance, a flat-screen television showcases a rotating image of a computer-generated object: a cross-section of a mock-up installation of a skylight, the likes of which a construction materials vendor might use in a sales pitch. As the skylight turns on screen, its falseness is revealed. We see the hollow core of its aluminum body, the foam insulation filling its interior, and the flimsy aluminum covering its wooden base. Although it already resembles an abstract sculpture more than an architectural form, Williams renders it even more useless by converting it from a real, three-dimensional object into a digital image. A humorous irony arises: a thing that is functionally inept but meant to represent a perfected form is venerated, perpetually rotating in its television display.

Three high-resolution photographs hung on the opposite wall develop this twisted logic and expand it to introduce novel combinations of materials. Here, Williams offers structural arrangements that are as unlikely as they are impractical. The least complex is a roughly hewn chunk of cinderblock resting on shiny, polished steel. On top of the block are perched a few sections of rectangular plastic piping and a small square of form liner, a plastic mold used to create the faux texture of stone on the surface of poured concrete. The smooth sides, sharp edges, and bright yellow hue of the piping contrast starkly with the coarseness of the cinderblock. Although all of the materials are new, their combination suggests a spatialized history of architecture, in which the bizarre forms of contemporary buildings rest, literally and theoretically, upon the remnants of older structures.

A second photograph combines even more materials, marrying metallic forms with a slab of translucent silicone splayed over a clay tile glazed in glossy black. Coarse aluminum foam and a sheet of silver ceramic bathroom tile seem to erupt from a tower of spooled metal sheets. Color unites the objects of this grouping while texture differentiates them. The third photograph combines the most disparate materials and achieves the most peculiar arrangement. A clay roofing tile, faintly imprinted with its brand name, stands on end, supported by silicone, mortar-smeared concrete, welded steel, and dark obsidian. The hardness and blackened shine of the steel and the obsidian resonate, but the rubbery green silicone contrasts sharply with the rugged red surface of the tile. A lump of mineral material perched on the other end of the tile further enhances this dynamic tension between the natural and the man-made.

A large chunk of this same mysterious rock appears in the nearby sculpture, Conservation Fountain (Cibolo Creek Fossil). Here, the hard, earthy material rests upon a steel palette immersed in a water-filled Plexiglas basin. A pump draws water from the basin and forces it through a mister aimed at the rock, which is actually fossilized plant matter excavated from the Hill Country north of San Antonio-where millennia ago, tide pools were a regular part of the landscape. The contrast between the geometric and structural rigidity of the man-made steel palette and the misshapenness of the naturally formed petrified rock reminds the viewer of the composite forms in Williams’s photographs. This time, however, the materials are not frozen in an ideal state. Quite to the contrary, the constant flow of water simulates and accelerates the conditions of natural erosion. Over the course of the exhibition, the fossil gradually dissolves into the tank and into the water that cycles through the fountain. Ironically, he has derived this process from conservation methods meant to clean artifacts gently and with minimal damage. In this sculpture, however, the mist fountain will do exactly the opposite, destroying the fossil and rusting its steel foundation.

Tension and Compression (Evans Rd. Quarry/Alamo Cement Co.) is a massive, unstable structure in the center of the gallery. Four pairs of threaded steel rods plunge through the floor and anchor the support structure suspending a stack of four concrete slabs. As an architectural model, the sculpture is deeply and obviously flawed. Over the course of the exhibition, the concrete will crack and crumble under its own weight, although steel reinforcements inside the slabs will prevent its total collapse. What it lacks in integrity, the structure gains in the naked truth of Williams’s architectural proposals: No structure, no material, no matter how advanced, will endure forever.

Other works in this cycle